A consistent measure of the merger histories of massive galaxies using close-pair statistics I: Major mergers at z < 3.5

Abstract

We use a large sample of 350,000 galaxies constructed by combining the UKIDSS UDS, VIDEO/CFHT-LS, UltraVISTA/COSMOS and GAMA survey regions to probe the major merging histories of massive galaxies (>1010\ M) at 0.005 < z < 3.5. We use a method adapted from that presented in Lopez-Sanjuan et al. (2014) using the full photometric redshift probability distributions, to measure pair fractions of flux-limited, stellar mass selected galaxy samples using close-pair statistics. The pair fraction is found to weakly evolve as (1+z)0.8 with no dependence on stellar mass. We subsequently derive major merger rates for galaxies at > 1010\ M and at a constant number density of n > 10-4 Mpc-3, and find rates a factor of 2-3 smaller than previous works, although this depends strongly on the assumed merger timescale and likelihood of a close-pair merging. Galaxies undergo approximately 0.5 major mergers at z < 3.5, accruing an additional 1-4 × 1010\ M in the process. Major merger accretion rate densities of 2 × 10-4 M yr-1 Mpc-3 are found for number density selected samples, indicating that direct progenitors of local massive (>1011M) galaxies have experienced a steady supply of stellar mass via major mergers throughout their evolution. While pair fractions are found to agree with those predicted by the Henriques et al. (2014) semi-analytic model, the Illustris hydrodynamical simulation fails to quantitatively reproduce derived merger rates. Furthermore, we find major mergers become a comparable source of stellar mass growth compared to star-formation at z < 1, but is 10-100 times smaller than the SFR density at higher redshifts.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…