Further Approximations for Demand Matching: Matroid Constraints and Minor-Closed Graphs

Abstract

We pursue a study of the Generalized Demand Matching problem, a common generalization of the b-Matching and Knapsack problems. Here, we are given a graph with vertex capacities, edge profits, and asymmetric demands on the edges. The goal is to find a maximum-profit subset of edges so the demands of chosen edges do not violate vertex capacities. This problem is APX-hard and constant-factor approximations are known. Our results fall into two categories. First, using iterated relaxation and various filtering strategies, we show with an efficient rounding algorithm if an additional matroid structure M is given and we further only allow sets F ⊂eq E that are independent in M, the natural LP relaxation has an integrality gap of at most 253 ≈ 8.333. This can be improved in various special cases, for example we improve over the 15-approximation for the previously-studied Coupled Placement problem [Korupolu et al. 2014] by giving a 7-approximation. Using similar techniques, we show the problem of computing a minimum-cost base in M satisfying vertex capacities admits a (1,3)-bicriteria approximation. This improves over the previous (1,4)-approximation in the special case that M is the graphic matroid over the given graph [Fukanaga and Nagamochi, 2009]. Second, we show Demand Matching admits a polynomial-time approximation scheme in graphs that exclude a fixed minor. If all demands are polynomially-bounded integers, this is somewhat easy using dynamic programming in bounded-treewidth graphs. Our main technical contribution is a sparsification lemma allowing us to scale the demands to be used in a more intricate dynamic programming algorithm, followed by randomized rounding to filter our scaled-demand solution to a feasible solution.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…