Intersecting families, cross-intersecting families, and a proof of a conjecture of Feghali, Johnson and Thomas
Abstract
A family A of sets is said to be intersecting if every two sets in A intersect. Two families A and B are said to be cross-intersecting if each set in A intersects each set in B. For a positive integer n, let [n] = \1, …, n\ and Sn = \A ⊂eq [n] 1 ∈ A\. In this note, we extend the Erdos-Ko-Rado Theorem by showing that if A and B are non-empty cross-intersecting families of subsets of [n], A is intersecting, and a0, a1, …, an, b0, b1, …, bn are non-negative real numbers such that ai + bi ≥ an-i + bn-i and an-i ≥ bi for each i ≤ n/2, then \[ΣA ∈ A a|A| + ΣB ∈ B b|B| ≤ ΣA ∈ Sn a|A| + ΣB ∈ Sn b|B|.\] For a graph G and an integer r, let IG(r) denote the family of r-element independent sets of G. Inspired by a problem of Holroyd and Talbot, Feghali, Johnson and Thomas conjectured that if r < n and G is a depth-two claw with n leaves, then G has a vertex v such that \A ∈ IG(r) v ∈ A\ is a largest intersecting subfamily of IG(r). They proved this for r ≤ n+12. We use the result above to prove the full conjecture.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.