Fluctuation tension and shape transition of vesicles: renormalisation calculations and Monte Carlo simulations

Abstract

It has been known for long that the fluctuation surface tension of membranes r, computed from the height fluctuation spectrum, is not equal to the bare surface tension σ introduced in the Helfrich theory. In this work we relate these two surface tensions both analytically and numerically and compare them to the Laplace tension γ, and the mechanical frame tension τ. Using one-loop renormalisation calculations, we obtain, in addition to the effective bending modulus eff, a new expression for the effective surface tension σ eff=σ - ε k BT/(2ap) where ap the projected cut-off area, and ε=3 or 1 according to the allowed configurations. Moreover we show that the crumpling transition for an infinite planar membrane occurs for σ eff=0, and also that it coincides with vanishing Laplace and frame tensions. Using extensive Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, triangulated membranes of vesicles made of N=100-2500 vertices are simulated. No local constraint is applied. It is shown that the numerical r is equal to σ eff both with radial MC moves (ε=3) and with corrected MC moves locally normal to the fluctuating membrane (ε=1). For finite vesicles of typical size R, two different regimes are defined: a tension regime for σ eff=σ effR2/ eff>0 and a bending one for -1< σ eff<0. A shape transition from a quasi-spherical shape imposed by the large surface energy, to more deformed shapes only controlled by the bending energy, is observed numerically at σ eff 0. We propose that the buckling transition, observed for planar supported membranes in the literature, occurs for σ eff-1, the associated negative frame tension playing the role of a compressive force.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…