Cut Tree Structures with Applications on Contraction-Based Sparsification

Abstract

We introduce three new cut tree structures of graphs G in which the vertex set of the tree is a partition of V(G) and contractions of tree vertices satisfy sparsification requirements that preserve various types of cuts. Recently, Kawarabayashi and Thorup Kawarabayashi2015a presented the first deterministic near-linear edge-connectivity recognition algorithm. A crucial step in this algorithm uses the existence of vertex subsets of a simple graph G whose contractions leave a graph with O(n/δ) vertices and O(n) edges (n := |V(G)|) such that all non-trivial min-cuts of G are preserved. We improve this result by eliminating the poly-logarithmic factors, that is, we show a contraction-based sparsification that leaves O(n/δ) vertices and O(n) edges and preserves all non-trivial min-cuts. We complement this result by giving a sparsification that leaves O(n/δ) vertices and O(n) edges such that all (possibly not minimum) cuts of size less than δ are preserved, by using contractions in a second tree structure. As consequence, we have that every simple graph has O(n/δ) δ-edge-connected components, and, if it is connected, it has O((n/δ)2) non-trivial min-cuts. All these results are proven to be asymptotically optimal. By using a third tree structure, we give a new lower bound on the number of pendant pairs. The previous best bound was given 1974 by Mader, who showed that every simple graph contains (δ2) pendant pairs. We improve this result by showing that every simple graph G with δ ≥ 5 or λ ≥ 4 or ≥ 3 contains (δ n) pendant pairs. We prove that this bound is asymptotically tight from several perspectives, and that (δ n) pendant pairs can be computed efficiently.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…