Comparative analysis of magnetic resonance in the polaron pair recombination and the triplet exciton-polaron quenching models
Abstract
We present a comparative theoretical study of magnetic resonance within the polaron pair recombination (PPR) and the triplet exciton-polaron quenching (TPQ) models. Both models have been invoked to interpret the photoluminescence detected magnetic resonance (PLDMR) in π-conjugated materials. We show that resonance lineshapes calculated within the two models differ dramatically in several regards. First, in the PPR model, the lineshape exhibits unusual behavior upon increasing the microwave power: it evolves from fully positive at weak power to fully negative at strong power. In contrast, in the TPQ model, the PLDMR is completely positive, showing a monotonic saturation. Second, the two models predict different dependencies of the resonance signal on the photoexcitation power, PL. At low PL, the resonance amplitude I/I is PL in the PPR model, while it is PL2 crossing over to PL3 in the TPQ model. On the physical level, the differences stem from different underlying spin dynamics. Most prominently, a negative resonance within the PPR model has its origin in the microwave-induced spin-Dicke effect, leading to the resonant quenching of photoluminescence. The spin-Dicke effect results from the spin-selective recombination, resulting in a highly correlated precession of the on-resonance pair-partners under the strong microwave power. This effect is not relevant to TPQ, where the majority of triplets are off-resonance due to the strong zero-field splitting. The analytical evaluation of lineshapes for the two models is enabled by expressing these shapes via the eigenvalues of a complex Hamiltonian. This bypasses the necessity of solving the much larger complex system of stochastic Liouville equations. Our findings pave the way towards a reliable discrimination between the two mechanisms via cw PLDMR.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.