Constraints on Spatially Oscillating Sub-mm Forces from the Stanford Levitated Microsphere Experiment Data

Abstract

A recent analysis by one of the authorsPerivolaropoulos:2016ucs has indicated the presence of a 2σ signal of spatially oscillating new force residuals in the torsion balance data of the Washington experiment. We extend that study and analyse the data of the Stanford Optically Levitated Microsphere Experiment (SOLME) Rider:2016xaq (kindly provided by the authors of Rider:2016xaq) searching for sub-mm spatially oscillating new force signals. We find a statistically significant oscillating signal for a force residual of the form F(z)=α \; cos(2πλ\; z +c) where z is the distance between the macroscopic interacting masses (levitated microsphere and cantilever). The best fit parameter values are α=(1.1 0.4)× 10-17N, λ=(35.2 0.6)μ m. Monte Carlo simulation of the SOLME data under the assumption of zero force residuals has indicated that the statistical significance of this signal is at about 2σ level. Private communication with members of the SOLME group has indicated that this previously unnoticed signal is most probably due to a systematic effect (diffraction of non-Gaussian tails of the laser beam). Thus it can only be useful as an upper bound of the amplitude of new spatially oscillating forces on sub-mm scales. Assuming gravitational origin emerging from a fundamental modification of the Newtonian potential of the form Veff(r)=-GMr(1+αO (2πλ\; r+θ)) VN(r)+Vosc(r), we evaluate the source integral and obtain a bound αO < 107 for λ 35 μ m. Thus, we get no useful constraints on the modified gravity parameter αO. However, the constraints on the general phenomenological parameter α can be useful in constraining other fifth force models related to dark energy (chameleon oscillating potentials etc).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…