Asymptotic behaviour of integral closures, quintasymptotic primes and ideal topologies
Abstract
Let R be a commutative Noetherian ring, N a finitely generated R-module and I an ideal of R. The set Q*(I, N), the quintasymptotic primes of I with respect to N, was originally introduced by McAdam Mc2. Also, the ideal Ia(N), the integral closure of I with respect to N, was introduced by R.Y. Sharp et al. in STY. The purpose of this paper is to show that, whenever S is a multiplicatively closed subset of R then the topologies defined by \(In)a(N)\n≥1 and \S((In)a(N))\n≥1 are equivalent if and only if S is disjoint from the quintasymptotic primes of I with respect to N. In addition, using this result, we also show that, if (R, m) is local and N is quasi-unmixed, then the local cohomology module H NI(N) vanishes if and only if there exists a multiplicatively closed subset S of R such that m S ≠ and the topologies induced by \(In)a(N)\n≥1 and \S((In)a(N))\n≥1 are equivalent. As a special of this characterization we obtain the main result of Marti-Farre MF.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.