Approximation of stable law in Wasserstein-1 distance by Stein's method
Abstract
Let n ∈ N, let ζn,1,...,ζn,n be a sequence of independent random variables with E ζn,i=0 and E |ζn,i|<∞ for each i, and let μ be an α-stable distribution having characteristic function e-|λ|α with α∈ (1,2). Denote Sn=ζn,1+...+ζn,n and its distribution by L(Sn), we bound the Wasserstein distance of L(Sn) and μ essentially by an L1 discrepancy between two kernels, this bound can be interpreted as a generalization of the Stein discrepancy (in L2 sense) introduced by Ledoux, Nourdin and Peccati. More precisely, we prove the following inequality: equation split dW( L (Sn), μ) \ C [Σi=1n∫-NN | Kα(t,N)n - Ki(t,N)α| d t \ +\ RN,n], split equation where dW is the Wasserstein distance of probability measures, Kα(t,N) is the kernel of a decomposition of the fractional Laplacian α2, Ki(t,N) is a kernel introduced by Chen, Goldstein and Shao with a truncation which can be interpreted as an L1 Stein kernel, and RN,n is a small remainder. The integral term Σi=1n∫-NN | Kα(t,N)n - Ki(t,N)α| d t can be interpreted as an L1 Stein discrepancy. As an application, we prove a general theorem of stable law convergence rate when ζn,i are i.i.d. and the distribution falls in the normal domain of attraction of μ. We also study four examples with comparing our convergence rates and those known for these examples, among which the distribution in the second example is not in the normal domain of attraction of μ.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.