On the Annihilator Ideal of an Inverse Form

Abstract

Let K be a field. We simplify and extend work of Althaler \& D\"ur on finite sequences over K by regarding K[x-1,z-1] as a K[x,z] module, and studying forms in K[x-1,z-1] from first principles. Then we apply our results to finite sequences. First we define the annihilator ideal IF of a non-zero form F∈ K[x-1,z-1], a homogeneous ideal. We inductively construct an ordered pair (f1\,,\,f2) of forms which generate IF\,; our generators are special in that z does not divide the leading grlex monomial of f1 but z divides f2\,, and the sum of their total degrees is always 2-|F|, where |F| is the total degree of F. We show that f1,f2 is a maximal regular sequence for IF, so that the height of IF is 2. The corresponding algorithm is |F|2/2. The row vector obtained by accumulating intermediate forms of the construction gives a minimal grlex Gr\"obner basis for IF for no extra computational cost other than storage and apply this to determining K (K[x,z] /IF)\,. We show that either the form vector is reduced or a monomial of f1 can be reduced by f2\,. This enables us to efficiently construct the unique reduced Gr\"obner basis for IF from the vector extension of our algorithm. Then we specialise to the inverse form of a finite sequence, obtaining generator forms for its annihilator ideal and a corresponding algorithm which does not use the last 'length change' of Massey. We compute the intersection of two annihilator ideals using syzygies in K[x,z]5. This improves a result of Althaler \& D\"ur. Finally, dehomogenisation induces a one-to-one correspondence (f1\,,f2) (minimal polynomial, auxiliary polynomial), the output of the author's variant of the Berlekamp-Massey algorithm. So we can also solve the LFSR synthesis problem via the corresponding algorithm for sequences.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…