Constructive Discrepancy Minimization with Hereditary L2 Guarantees

Abstract

In discrepancy minimization problems, we are given a family of sets S = \S1,…,Sm\, with each Si ∈ S a subset of some universe U = \u1,…,un\ of n elements. The goal is to find a coloring : U \-1,+1\ of the elements of U such that each set S ∈ S is colored as evenly as possible. Two classic measures of discrepancy are ∞-discrepancy defined as disc∞(S,):=S ∈ S | Σui ∈ S (ui) | and 2-discrepancy defined as disc2(S,):=(1/|S|)ΣS ∈ S (Σui ∈ S(ui))2. Breakthrough work by Bansal gave a polynomial time algorithm, based on rounding an SDP, for finding a coloring such that disc∞(S,) = O( n · herdisc∞(S)) where herdisc∞(S) is the hereditary ∞-discrepancy of S. We complement his work by giving a simple O((m+n)n2) time algorithm for finding a coloring such disc2(S,) = O( n · herdisc2(S)) where herdisc2(S) is the hereditary 2-discrepancy of S. Interestingly, our algorithm avoids solving an SDP and instead relies on computing eigendecompositions of matrices. Moreover, we use our ideas to speed up the Edge-Walk algorithm by Lovett and Meka [SICOMP'15]. To prove that our algorithm has the claimed guarantees, we show new inequalities relating herdisc∞ and herdisc2 to the eigenvalues of the matrix corresponding to S. Our inequalities improve over previous work by Chazelle and Lvov, and by Matousek et al. Finally, we also implement our algorithm and show that it far outperforms random sampling.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…