On Mubayi's Conjecture and conditionally intersecting sets
Abstract
Mubayi's Conjecture states that if F is a family of k-sized subsets of [n] = \1,…,n\ which, for k ≥ d ≥ 2, satisfies A1 ·s Ad ≠ whenever |A1 ·s Ad| ≤ 2k for all distinct sets A1,…,Ad ∈F, then |F|≤ n-1k-1, with equality occurring only if F is the family of all k-sized subsets containing some fixed element. This paper proves that Mubayi's Conjecture is true for all families that are invariant with respect to shifting; indeed, these families satisfy a stronger version of Mubayi's Conjecture. Relevant to the conjecture, we prove a fundamental bijective duality between (i,j)-unstable families and (j,i)-unstable families. Generalising previous intersecting conditions, we introduce the (d,s,t)-conditionally intersecting condition for families of sets and prove general results thereon. We conjecture on the size and extremal structures of families F∈[n]k that are (d,2k)-conditionally intersecting but which are not intersecting, and prove results related to this conjecture. We prove fundamental theorems on two (d,s)-conditionally intersecting families that generalise previous intersecting families, and we pose an extension of a previous conjecture by Frankl and F\"uredi on (3,2k-1)-conditionally intersecting families. Finally, we generalise a classical result by Erdos, Ko and Rado by proving tight upper bounds on the size of (2,s)-conditionally intersecting families F⊂eq 2[n] and by characterising the families that attain these bounds. We extend this theorem for certain parametres as well as for sufficiently large families with respect to (2,s)-conditionally intersecting families F⊂eq 2[n] whose members have at most a fixed number u members.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.