Weak square and stationary reflection
Abstract
It is well-known that the square principle λ entails the existence of a non-reflecting stationary subset of λ+, whereas the weak square principle *λ does not. Here we show that if μcf(λ) < λ for all μ < λ, then *λ entails the existence of a non-reflecting stationary subset of Eλ+cf(λ) in the forcing extension for adding a single Cohen subset of λ+. It follows that indestructible forms of simultaneous stationary reflection entail the failure of weak square. We demonstrate this by settling a question concerning the subcomplete forcing axiom (SCFA), proving that SCFA entails the failure of *λ for every singular cardinal λ of countable cofinality.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.