The universal finite set
Abstract
We define a certain finite set in set theory \x(x)\ and prove that it exhibits a universal extension property: it can be any desired particular finite set in the right set-theoretic universe and it can become successively any desired larger finite set in top-extensions of that universe. Specifically, ZFC proves the set is finite; the definition has complexity 2, so that any affirmative instance of it (x) is verified in any sufficiently large rank-initial segment of the universe Vθ; the set is empty in any transitive model and others; and if defines the set y in some countable model M of ZFC and y z for some finite set z in M, then there is a top-extension of M to a model N in which defines the new set z. Thus, the set shows that no model of set theory can realize a maximal 2 theory with its natural number parameters, although this is possible without parameters. Using the universal finite set, we prove that the validities of top-extensional set-theoretic potentialism, the modal principles valid in the Kripke model of all countable models of set theory, each accessing its top-extensions, are precisely the assertions of S4. Furthermore, if ZFC is consistent, then there are models of ZFC realizing the top-extensional maximality principle.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.