On a question of Krajewski's

Abstract

In this paper we provide a (negative) solution to a problem posed by Stanisaw Krajewski. Consider a recursively enumerable theory U and a finite expansion of the signature of U that contains at least one predicate symbol of arity 2. We show that, for any finite extension α of U in the expanded language that is conservative over U, there is a conservative extension β of U in the expanded language, such that αβ and βα. The result is preserved when we consider either extensions or model-conservative extensions of U in stead of conservative extensions. Moreover, the result is preserved when we replace as ordering on the finitely axiomatized extensions in the expanded language by a special kind of interpretability, to wit interpretability that identically translates the symbols of the U-language. We show that the result fails when we consider an expansion with only unary predicate symbols for conservative extensions of U ordered by interpretability that preserves the symbols of U.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…