Symmetry breaking for representations of rank one orthogonal groups II

Abstract

For a pair (G,G')=(O(n+1,1), O(n,1)) of reductive groups, we investigate intertwining operators (symmetry breaking operators) between principal series representations Iδ(V,λ) of G, and Jε(W,) of the subgroup G'. The representations are parametrized by finite-dimensional representations V,W of O(n) respectively of O(n-1), characters δ, of O(1), and λ, ∈ C. The multiplicty [V:W] of W occurring in the restriction V|O(n-1) is either 0 or 1. If [V:W] 0 then we construct a holomorphic family of symmetry breaking operators and prove that dim HomG'(Iδ(V, λ)|G', Jε(W, )) is nonzero for all the parameters λ, and δ, ε, whereas if [V:W] = 0 there may exist sporadic differential symmetry breaking operators. We propose a "classification scheme" to find all matrix-valued symmetry breaking operators explicitly,and carry out this program completely when V and W are exterior tensor representations. In conformal geometry, our results yield the complete classification of conformal covariant operators from differential forms on a Riemannian manifold X to those on a submanifold Y in the model space (X, Y) = (Sn, Sn-1). We use these results to determine symmetry breaking operators for any pair of irreducible representations of G and the subgroup G' with trivial infinitesimal character. Furthermore we prove the multiplicity conjecture by Gross and Prasad for tempered principal series representations of (SO(n+1,1),SO(n,1)) and also for 3 tempered representations , π, of SO(2m+2,1), SO(2m+1,1) and SO(2m,1) with trivial infinitesimal character. In connection to automorphic form theory, we apply our main results to find "periods" of irreducible representations of the Lorentz group having nonzero (g, K)-cohomologies.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…