Viable Insider Markets

Abstract

We consider the problem of optimal inside portfolio π(t) in a financial market with a corresponding wealth process X(t)=Xπ(t) modelled by aligneq0.1 cases dX(t)&=π(t)X(t)[α(t)dt+β(t)dB(t)]; t∈[0, T] X(0)&=x0>0, cases align where B(·) is a Brownian motion. We assume that the insider at time t has access to market information t>0 units ahead of time, in addition to the history of the market up to time t. The problem is to find an insider portfolio π* which maximizes the expected logarithmic utility J(π) of the terminal wealth, i.e. such that πJ(π)= J(π*), where J(π)= E[(Xπ(T))]. The insider market is called viable if this value is finite. We study under what inside information flow H the insider market is viable or not. For example, assume that for all t<T the insider knows the value of B(t+εt), where t + εt ≥ T converges monotonically to T from above as t goes to T from below. Then (assuming that the insider has a perfect memory) at time t she has the inside information Ht, consisting of the history Ft of B(s); 0 ≤ s ≤ t plus all the values of Brownian motion in the interval [t+εt, ε0], i.e. we have the enlarged filtration equationeq0.2 H=\Ht\t∈[0.T], Ht=Ftσ(B(t+εt+r),0≤ r ≤ ε0-t-εt), ∀ t∈ [0,T]. equation Using forward integrals, Hida-Malliavin calculus and Donsker delta functionals we show that if ∫0T1tdt=∞, then the insider market is not viable.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…