Minimum saturated families of sets
Abstract
We call a family F of subsets of [n] s-saturated if it contains no s pairwise disjoint sets, and moreover no set can be added to F while preserving this property (here [n] = \1,…,n\). More than 40 years ago, Erdos and Kleitman conjectured that an s-saturated family of subsets of [n] has size at least (1 - 2-(s-1))2n. It is easy to show that every s-saturated family has size at least 12· 2n, but, as was mentioned by Frankl and Tokushige, even obtaining a slightly better bound of (1/2 + )2n, for some fixed > 0, seems difficult. In this note, we prove such a result, showing that every s-saturated family of subsets of [n] has size at least (1 - 1/s)2n. This lower bound is a consequence of a multipartite version of the problem, in which we seek a lower bound on |F1| + … + |Fs| where F1, …, Fs are families of subsets of [n], such that there are no s pairwise disjoint sets, one from each family Fi, and furthermore no set can be added to any of the families while preserving this property. We show that |F1| + … + |Fs| (s-1)· 2n, which is tight e.g.\ by taking F1 to be empty, and letting the remaining families be the families of all subsets of [n].
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.