Glauber-model analysis of 5 TeV p-Pb centrality compared to a two-component (soft + hard) model of hadron production in high-energy nuclear collisions

Abstract

A recent study of 5 TeV p-Pb centrality combined a Glauber model of p-Pb collision geometry with an assumption of linear scaling between nch (charge) integrated within some η acceptance and the number of nucleon participants Npart. The study concluded that Npart increases to nearly 16 in central collisions, and the high-pt region of p-Pb pt spectra rescaled by the Glauber-estimated number of p-N binary collisions remains consistent with a p-p spectrum for the same energy, independent of p-Pb centrality. However, the relation between Npart and nch derived from a two-component (soft + hard) model (TCM) study of ensemble-mean pt data for the same system is quite different. This article reports a detailed analysis of the Glauber study and the question of centrality in p-A collisions. The Glauber centrality model is compared with the pt TCM to understand the sources of major differences. The assumption of linear proportionality between nch and Npart is found to be inconsistent with pt data. Properties of the convolution integral relating a differential cross section and hadron production model to an event distribution on nch are examined. An alternative differential-cross-section distribution is inferred from charge-multiplicity data, and the upper limit on Npart is estimated to be near 8. The TCM centrality model is then applied to pt spectrum ratios to predict results for p-Pb spectra. The spectrum TCM is tested with identified-pion spectra from 5 TeV p-Pb collisions and the result is consistent with previous p-p TCM results. A TCM prediction that the spectrum ratio at high pt should increase to 14 for central p-Pb collisions due to quadratic dependence of dijet production on nch is consistent with pt data from the same system.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…