A classification of 3+1D bosonic topological orders (II): the case when some point-like excitations are fermions

Abstract

In this paper, we classify EF topological orders for 3+1D bosonic systems where some emergent pointlike excitations are fermions. (1) We argue that all 3+1D bosonic topological orders have gappable boundary. (2) All the pointlike excitations in EF topological orders are described by the representations of Gf=Z2fe2 Gb -- a Z2f central extension of a finite group Gb characterized by e2∈ H2(Gb,Z2). (3) We find that the EF topological orders are classified by 2+1D anomalous topological orders Ab3 on their unique canonical boundary. Here Ab3 is a unitary fusion 2-category with simple objects labeled by Gb=Z2m Gb. Ab3 also has one invertible fermionic 1-morphism for each object as well as quantum-dimension- 2 1-morphisms that connect two objects g and gm, where g∈ Gb and m is the generator of Z2m. (4) When Gb is the trivial Z2m extension, the EF topological orders are called EF1 topological orders, which is classified by simple data (Gb,e2,n3,4). (5) When Gb is a non-trivial Z2m extension, the EF topological orders are called EF2 topological orders, where some intersections of three stringlike excitations must carry Majorana zero modes. (6) Every EF2 topological order with Gf=Z2f Gb can be associated with a EF1 topological order with Gf=Z2f Gb. (7) We find that all EF topological orders correspond to gauged 3+1D fermionic symmetry protected topological (SPT) orders with a finite unitary symmetry group. (8) We further propose that the general classification of 3+1D topological orders with finite unitary symmetries for bosonic and fermionic systems can be obtained by gauging or partially gauging the finite symmetry group of 3+1D SPT phases of bosonic and fermionic systems.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…