Non-forking w-good frames
Abstract
We introduce the notion of a w-good λ-frame which is a weakening of Shelah's notion of a good λ-frame. Existence of a w-good λ-frame implies existence of a model of size λ++. Tameness and amalgamation imply extension of a w-good λ-frame to larger models. As an application we show: Theorem Suppose 2λ< 2λ+ < 2λ++ and 2λ+ > λ++. If I(K, λ) = I(K, λ+) = 1 ≤ I(K, λ++) < 2λ++ and K is (λ, λ+)-tame, then Kλ+++ ≠ . The proof presented clarifies some of the details of the main theorem of [Sh576] and avoids using the heavy set-theoretic machinery of [Sh: h VII] by replacing it with tameness.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.