A Framework for Searching in Graphs in the Presence of Errors
Abstract
We consider the problem of searching for an unknown target vertex t in a (possibly edge-weighted) graph. Each vertex-query points to a vertex v and the response either admits v is the target or provides any neighbor s=v that lies on a shortest path from v to t. This model has been introduced for trees by Onak and Parys [FOCS 2006] and for general graphs by Emamjomeh-Zadeh et al. [STOC 2016]. In the latter, the authors provide algorithms for the error-less case and for the independent noise model (where each query independently receives an erroneous answer with known probability p<1/2 and a correct one with probability 1-p). We study this problem in both adversarial errors and independent noise models. First, we show an algorithm that needs 2 n1 - H(r) queries against adversarial errors, where adversary is bounded with its rate of errors by a known constant r<1/2. Our algorithm is in fact a simplification of previous work, and our refinement lies in invoking amortization argument. We then show that our algorithm coupled with Chernoff bound argument leads to an algorithm for independent noise that is simpler and with a query complexity that is both simpler and asymptotically better to one of Emamjomeh-Zadeh et al. [STOC 2016]. Our approach has a wide range of applications. First, it improves and simplifies Robust Interactive Learning framework proposed by Emamjomeh-Zadeh et al. [NIPS 2017]. Secondly, performing analogous analysis for edge-queries (where query to edge e returns its endpoint that is closer to target) we actually recover (as a special case) noisy binary search algorithm that is asymptotically optimal, matching the complexity of Feige et al. [SIAM J. Comput. 1994]. Thirdly, we improve and simplify upon existing algorithm for searching of unbounded domains due to Aslam and Dhagat [STOC 1991].
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.