Spin Transport in Half-Metallic Ferromagnet-Superconductor Junctions

Abstract

We investigate the charge and spin transport in half-metallic ferromagnet (F) and superconductor (S) nanojunctions. We utilize a self-consistent microscopic method that can accommodate the broad range of energy scales present, and ensures proximity effects that account for the interactions at the interfaces are accurately determined. Two experimentally relevant half-metallic junction types are considered: The first is a F1 F2 S structure, where a half-metallic ferromagnet F1 adjoins a weaker conventional ferromagnet F2. The current is injected through the F1 layer by means of an applied bias voltage. The second configuration involves a S F1 F2 F3 S Josephson junction whereby a phase difference between the two superconducting electrodes generates the supercurrent flow. In this case, the central half-metallic F2 layer is surrounded by two weak ferromagnets F1 and F3. By placing a ferromagnet with a weak exchange field adjacent to an S layer, we are able to optimize the conversion process in which opposite-spin triplet pairs are converted into equal-spin triplet pairs that propagate deep into the half-metallic regions in both junction types. For the tunnel junctions, we study the bias-induced local magnetization, spin currents, and spin transfer torques for various orientations of the relative magnetization angle θ in the F layers. We find that the bias-induced equal-spin triplet pairs are maximized in the half-metal for θ≈90 and as part of the conversion process, are anticorrelated with the opposite-spin pairs. We show that the charge current density is maximized, corresponding to the occurrence of a large amplitude of equal-spin triplet pairs, when the exchange interaction of the weak ferromagnet is about 0.1EF.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…