Commentary: Intentional Observer Effects on Quantum Randomness: A Bayesian Analysis Reveals Evidence Against Micro-Psychokinesis

Abstract

The paper titled `Intentional Observer Effects on Quantum Randomness: A Bayesian Analysis Reveals Evidence Against Micro-Psychokinesis', published in Frontiers of Psychology in March 2018, reports on a mind-matter experiment with the main result of strong evidence against Micro-Psychokinesis. Despite this conclusion, the authors interpret the observed pattern in their data as possible evidence for Micro-Psychokinesis, albeit of a different kind. Suggesting a connection to some existing models, the authors put forward the hypothesis that a higher frequency of slow data variations can be observed in their experiment data than in a set of control data. This commentary analyses this claim and concludes that the variation in the data motivating this hypothesis would show up just by chance with a probability of p=0.328 under a null hypothesis. Therefore, there is no evidence for the hypothesis of faster data variations, and thus for this kind of suggested Micro-Psychokinesis in this experiment.