Chemical potential of a test hard sphere of variable size in hard-sphere fluid mixtures

Abstract

A detailed comparison between the Boubl\'ik-Mansoori-Carnahan-Starling-Leland (BMCSL)equation of state of hard-sphere mixtures is made with Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations of the same compositions. The Lab\'ik and Smith simulation technique [S. Lab\'ik and W. R. Smith, Mol. Simul. 12, 23-31 (1994)] was used to implement the Widom particle insertion method to calculate the excess chemical potential, β μ0ex, of a test particle of variable diameter, σ0, immersed in a hard-sphere fluid mixture with different compositions and values of the packing fraction, η. Use is made of the fact that the only polynomial representation of β μ0ex which is consistent with the limits σ0 0 and σ0∞ has to be of the cubic form, i.e., c0(η)+c1(η)σ0/M1+c2(η)(σ0/M1)2+c3(η)(σ0/M1)3, where M1 is the first moment of the distribution. The first two coefficients, c0(η) and c1(η), are known analytically, while c2(η) and c3(η) were obtained by fitting the MD data to this expression. This in turn provides a method to determine the excess free energy per particle, β aex, in terms of c2, c3, and the compressibility factor, Z. Very good agreement between the BMCSL formulas and the MD data is found for β μex0, Z, and β aex for binary mixtures and continuous particle size distributions with the top-hat analytic form. However, the BMCSL theory typically slightly underestimates the simulation values, especially for Z, differences which the Boubl\'ik-Carnahan-Starling-Kolafa formulas and an interpolation between two Percus-Yevick routes capture well in different ranges of the system parameter space.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…