Quantifying the AGN-driven outflows in ULIRGs (QUADROS) III: Measurements of the radii and kinetic powers of 8 near-nuclear outflows

Abstract

As part of the QUADROS project to quantify the impact of AGN-driven outflows in rapidly evolving galaxies in the local universe, we present observations of 8 nearby ULIRGs (0.04 < z < 0.2) taken with the ISIS spectrograph on the William Herschel Telescope (WHT), and also summarise the results of the project as a whole. Consistent with Rose2018, we find that the outflow regions are compact (0.08 < R[OIII] < 1.5 kpc), and the electron densities measured using the [SII], [OII] trans-auroral emission-line ratios are relatively high (2.5 < log ne(cm-3) < 4.5, median log ne(cm-3) 3.1). Many of the outflow regions are also significantly reddened (median E(B-V) 0.5). Assuming that the de-projected outflow velocities are represented by the 5th percentile velocities (v05) of the broad, blueshifted components of [OIII]λ5007, we calculate relatively modest mass outflow rates (0.1 < M < 20 M yr-1, median M 2 M yr-1), and find kinetic powers as a fraction of the AGN bolometric luminosity (F = E/Lbol) in the range 0.02 < F < 3 \%, median F 0.3 \%). The latter estimates are in line with the predictions of multi-stage outflow models, or single-stage models in which only a modest fraction of the initial kinetic power of the inner disk winds is transferred to the larger-scale outflows. Considering the QUADROS sample as a whole, we find no clear evidence for correlations between the properties of the outflows and the bolometric luminosities of the AGN, albeit based on a sample that covers a relatively small range in Lbol. Overall, our results suggest that there is a significant intrinsic scatter in outflow properties of ULIRGs for a given AGN luminosity.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…