Flow polynomials of a signed graph

Abstract

In contrast to ordinary graphs, the number of the nowhere-zero group-flows in a signed graph may vary with different groups, even if the groups have the same order. In fact, for a signed graph G and non-negative integer d, it was shown that there exists a polynomial Fd(G,x) such that the number of the nowhere-zero -flows in G equals Fd(G,x) evaluated at k for every Abelian group of order k with ε()=d, where ε() is the largest integer d for which has a subgroup isomorphic to Zd2. We focus on the combinatorial structure of -flows in a signed graph and the coefficients in Fd(G,x). We first define the fundamental directed circuits for a signed graph G and show that all -flows (not necessarily nowhere-zero) in G can be generated by these circuits. It turns out that all -flows in G can be evenly classified into 2ε()-classes specified by the elements of order 2 in , each class of which consists of the same number of flows depending only on the order of the group. This gives an explanation for why the number of -flows in a signed graph varies with different ε(), and also gives an answer to a problem posed by Beck and Zaslavsky. Secondly, using an extension of Whitney's broken circuit theory we give a combinatorial interpretation of the coefficients in Fd(G,x) for d=0, in terms of the broken bonds. As an example, we give an analytic expression of F0(G,x) for a class of the signed graphs that contain no balanced circuit. Finally, we show that the sets of edges in a signed graph that contain no broken bond form a homogeneous simplicial complex.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…