Approximation Accuracy of the Krylov Subspaces for Linear Discrete Ill-Posed Problems
Abstract
For the large-scale linear discrete ill-posed problem \|Ax-b\| or Ax=b with b contaminated by Gaussian white noise, the Lanczos bidiagonalization based Krylov solver LSQR and its mathematically equivalent CGLS, the Conjugate Gradient (CG) method implicitly applied to ATAx=ATb, are most commonly used, and CGME, the CG method applied to \|AATy-b\| or AATy=b with x=ATy, and LSMR, which is equivalent to the minimal residual (MINRES) method applied to ATAx=ATb, have also been choices. These methods exhibit typical semi-convergence feature, and the iteration number k plays the role of the regularization parameter. However, there has been no definitive answer to the long-standing fundamental question: Can LSQR and CGLS find 2-norm filtering best possible regularized solutions? The same question is for CGME and LSMR too. At iteration k, LSQR, CGME and LSMR compute different iterates from the same k dimensional Krylov subspace. A first and fundamental step towards to answering the above question is to accurately estimate the accuracy of the underlying k dimensional Krylov subspace approximating the k dimensional dominant right singular subspace of A. Assuming that the singular values of A are simple, we present a general Θ theorem for the 2-norm distances between these two subspaces and derive accurate estimates on them for severely, moderately and mildly ill-posed problems. We also establish some relationships between the smallest Ritz values and these distances. Numerical experiments justify the sharpness of our results.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.