Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimension
Abstract
We show that every approximately differentially private learning algorithm (possibly improper) for a class H with Littlestone dimension~d requires (*(d)) examples. As a corollary it follows that the class of thresholds over N can not be learned in a private manner; this resolves open question due to [Bun et al., 2015, Feldman and Xiao, 2015]. We leave as an open question whether every class with a finite Littlestone dimension can be learned by an approximately differentially private algorithm.
0
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.