A redshift-independent efficiency model: star formation and stellar masses in dark matter halos at z>4

Abstract

We explore the connection between the UV luminosity functions (LFs) of high-z galaxies and the distribution of stellar masses and star-formation histories (SFHs) in their host dark matter halos. We provide a baseline for a redshift-independent star-formation efficiency model to which observations and models can be compared. Our model assigns a star-formation rate (SFR) to each dark matter halo based on the growth rate of the halo and a redshift-independent star-formation efficiency. The dark matter halo accretion rate is obtained from a high-resolution N-body simulation in order to capture the stochasticity in accretion histories and to obtain spatial information for the distribution of galaxies. The halo mass dependence of the star-formation efficiency is calibrated at z=4 by requiring a match to the observed UV LF at this redshift. The model then correctly predicts the observed UV LF at z=5-10. We present predictions for the UV luminosity and stellar mass functions, JWST number counts, and SFHs. In particular, we find a stellar-to-halo mass relation at z=4-10 that scales with halo mass at M h<1011~M as M M h2, with a normalization that is higher than the relation inferred at z=0. The average SFRs increase as a function of time to z=4, although there is significant scatter around the average: about 6\% of the z=4 galaxies show no significant mass growth. Using these SFHs, we present redshift-dependent UV-to-SFR conversion factors, mass return fractions, and mass-to-light ratios for different intial mass functions and metallicities, finding that current estimates of the cosmic SFR density at z10 may be overestimated by 0.1-0.2~dex.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…