Trees, parking functions, and standard monomials of skeleton ideals

Abstract

Parking functions are a widely studied class of combinatorial objects, with connections to several branches of mathematics. On the algebraic side, parking functions can be identified with the standard monomials of Mn, a certain monomial ideal in the polynomial ring S = K[x1, …, xn] where a set of generators are indexed by the nonempty subsets of [n] = \1,2,…,n\. Motivated by constructions from the theory of chip-firing on graphs we study generalizations of parking functions determined by M(k)n, a subideal of Mn obtained by allowing only generators corresponding to subsets of [n] of size at most k. For each k the set of standard monomials of M(k)n, denoted stannk, contains the usual parking functions and has interesting combinatorial properties in its own right. For general k we show that elements of stannk can be recovered as certain vector-parking functions, which in turn leads to a formula for their count via results of Yan. The symmetric group Sn naturally acts on the set stannk and we also obtain a formula for the number of orbits under this action. For the case of k = n-2 we study combinatorial interpretations of stannn-2 and relate them to properties of uprooted trees in terms of root degree and surface inversions. As a corollary we obtain a combinatorial identity for nn involving Catalan numbers, reminiscent of a result of Benjamin and Juhnke. For the case of k = 1 we observe that the number of elements stann1 is given by the determinant of the reduced `signless' Laplacian, which provides a weighted count for |stann1| in terms generalized spanning trees known as `spanning TU-subgraphs'. Our constructions naturally generalize to arbitrary graphs and lead to a number of open questions.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…