Subspace-Invariant AC0 Formulas

Abstract

We consider the action of a linear subspace U of \0,1\n on the set of AC0 formulas with inputs labeled by literals in the set \X1, X1,…,Xn, Xn\, where an element u ∈ U acts on formulas by transposing the ith pair of literals for all i ∈ [n] such that ui=1. A formula is U-invariant if it is fixed by this action. For example, there is a well-known recursive construction of depth d+1 formulas of size O(n·2dn1/d) computing the n-variable PARITY function; these formulas are easily seen to be P-invariant where P is the subspace of even-weight elements of \0,1\n. In this paper we establish a nearly matching 2d(n1/d-1) lower bound on the P-invariant depth d+1 formula size of PARITY. Quantitatively this improves the best known (2184d(n1/d-1)) lower bound for unrestricted depth d+1 formulas, while avoiding the use of the switching lemma. More generally, for any linear subspaces U ⊂ V, we show that if a Boolean function is U-invariant and non-constant over V, then its U-invariant depth d+1 formula size is at least 2d(m1/d-1) where m is the minimum Hamming weight of a vector in U V.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…