Zero range interactions in d=3 and d=2 revisited

Abstract

This paper has a two-fold purpose: 1) to clarify the difference between contact and weak-contact interactions (called point interactions in [A] in the case N=2) in three dimensions and their role in providing spectral properties and boundary conditions. 2) to analyze the same problem in two dimensions. Both contact and weak-contact are "zero range interactions" or equivalently self-adjoint extension of the symmetric operator H0, the free hamiltonian for a system of N particles, restricted to functions that vanish in some neighborhood of the contact manyfold = i,j \ xi - xj = 0\ \;\; i = j =1 … N . The hamiltonian formulation of a weak-contact interaction requires the presence of a zero energy resonance. Both can be obtained, for N ≥ 3, as scaling limit, in the strong resolvent sense, of hamiltonians with two-body central potentials of very short range; the scaling is different in the two cases. The contact "potential" is a distribution on the "contact manyfold"; the laplacian is now two dimensional and the scaling properties under dilation of the laplacian are now the same as those of the contact interaction. This makes a major difference in the spectral properties. Contact interaction defines now a hamiltonian system. In two dimensions one can consider a hamiltonian system of three particle of mass m having as potential a contact potential and the product of two weak-contact potentials. In the limit m ∞ their wave functions have vanishingly small support and the system may be regarded as a point with internal structure; the spectrum has an essential singularity at the bottom of the continuous part. The Wave Operator for the interaction with a fourth particle extends to a bounded map on L p for all 1 < p < ∞ [E,G,G]

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…