THE MOSDEF SURVEY: The Nature of Mid-Infrared Excess Galaxies and a Comparison of IR and UV Star Formation Tracers at z~2

Abstract

We present an analysis using the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey on the nature of "MIR-excess" galaxies, which have star formation rates (SFR) inferred from mid-infrared (MIR) data that is substantially elevated relative to that estimated from dust-corrected UV data. We use a sample of 200 galaxies and AGN at 1.40<z<2.61 with 24 μm detections (rest-frame 8μm) from MIPS/Spitzer. We find that the identification of MIR-excess galaxies strongly depends on the methodologies used to estimate IR luminosity ( LIR) and to correct the UV light for dust attenuation. We find that extrapolations of the SFR from the observed 24 μm flux, using luminosity-dependent templates based on local galaxies, substantially overestimate LIR in z2 galaxies. By including Herschel observations and using a stellar mass-dependent, luminosity-independent LIR, we obtain more reliable estimates of the SFR and a lower fraction of MIR-excess galaxies. Once stellar mass selection biases are taken into account, we identify 24\% of our galaxies as MIR-excess. However, SFRHα is not elevated in MIR-excess galaxies compared to MIR-normal galaxies, indicating that the intrinsic fraction of MIR-excess may be lower. Using X-ray, IR, and optically-selected AGN in MOSDEF, we do not find a higher prevalence for AGN in MIR-excess galaxies relative to MIR-normal galaxies. A stacking analysis of X-ray undetected galaxies does not reveal a harder spectrum in MIR-excess galaxies relative to MIR-normal galaxies. Our analysis indicates that AGN activity does not contribute substantially to the MIR excess and instead implies that it is likely due to the enhanced PAH emission.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…