Rational vs transcendental points on analytic Riemann surfaces

Abstract

Let (X,L) be a polarized variety over a number field. We suppose that L is an hermitian line bundle. Let M be a non compact Riemann Surface and U⊂ M be a relatively compact open set. Let :M X( C) be a holomorphic map. For every positive real number T, let AU(T) be the cardinality of the set of z∈ U such that (z)∈ X(K) and hL((z))≤ T. After a revisitation of the proof of the sub exponential bound for AU(T), obtained by Bombieri and Pila , we show that there are intervals of T's as big as we want for which AU(T) is upper bounded by a polynomial in T. We then introduce subsets of type S with respect of . These are compact subsets of M for which an inequality similar to Liouville inequality on algebraic points holds. We show that, if M contains a subset of type S, then, for every value of T the number AU(T) is bounded by a polynomial in T. As a consequence, we show that if M is a smooth leaf of a foliation in curves then AU(T) is bounded by a polynomial in T. Let S(X) be the subset (full for the Lebesgue measure) of points which verify some kind of Liouville inequalities. In the second part we prove that -1(S(X))≠ if and only if -1(S(X)) is full for the Lebesgue measure on M.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…