A simple counterexample to the Monge ansatz in multi-marginal optimal transport, convex geometry of the set of Kantorovich plans, and the Frenkel-Kontorova model
Abstract
It is known from clever mathematical examples Ca10 that the Monge ansatz may fail in continuous two-marginal optimal transport (alias optimal coupling alias optimal assignment) problems. Here we show that this effect already occurs for finite assignment problems with N=3 marginals, =3 'sites', and symmetric pairwise costs, with the values for N and both being optimal. Our counterexample is a transparent consequence of the convex geometry of the set of symmetric Kantorovich plans for N==3, which -- as we show -- possess 22 extreme points, only 7 of which are Monge. These extreme points have a simple physical meaning as irreducible molecular packings, and the example corresponds to finding the minimum energy packing for Frenkel-Kontorova interactions. Our finite example naturally gives rise, by superposition, to a continuous one, where failure of the Monge ansatz manifests itself as nonattainment and formation of 'microstructure'.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.