The existential transversal property: a generalization of homogeneity and its impact on semigroups

Abstract

Let G be a permutation group of degree n, and k a positive integer with k n. We say that G has the k-existential property, or k-et for short, if there exists a k-subset A of the domain such that, for any k-partition P of , there exists g∈ G mapping A to a transversal (a section) for P. This property is a substantial weakening of the k-universal transversal property, or k-ut, investigated by the first and third author, which required this condition to hold for all k-subsets A of the domain. Our first task in this paper is to investigate the k-et property and to decide which groups satisfy it. For example, we show that, for 8 k n/2, the only groups with k-et are the symmetric and alternating groups; this is best possible since the Mathieu group M24 has 7-et. We determine all groups with k-et for 4 k n/2, up to some unresolved cases for k=4,5, and describe the property for k=2,3 in permutation group language. In the previous work, the results were applied to semigroups, in particular, to the question of when the semigroup G,t is regular, where t is a map of rank k (with k<n/2); this turned out to be equivalent to the k-ut property. The question investigated here is when there is a k-subset A of the domain such that G, t is regular for all maps t with image A. This turns out to be more delicate; the k-et property (with A as witnessing set) is a necessary condition, and the combination of k-et and (k-1)-ut is sufficient, but the truth lies somewhere between. Given the knowledge that a group under consideration has the necessary condition of k-et, we solve the regularity question for k n/2 except for one sporadic group.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…