Seymour's Second Neighborhood Conjecture for Subsets of Vertices

Abstract

Seymour conjectured that every oriented simple graph contains a vertex whose second neighborhood is at least as large as its first. In this note, we put forward a conjecture that we prove is actually equivalent: every oriented simple graph contains a subset of vertices S whose second neighborhood is at least as large as its first. This subset perspective gives some insight into the original conjecture. For example, if there is a counterexample to the second neighborhood conjecture with minimum degree δ, then there exists a counterexample on at most δ + 1 2 vertices. Given a vertex v, let d1+(v) and d2+(v) be the size of its first and second neighborhoods respectively. A digraph is m-free if there is no directed cycle on m or fewer vertices. Let λm be the largest value such that every m-free graph contains a vertex v with d2+(v) ≥ λm d1+(v). The second neighborhood conjecture implies λm = 1 for all m ≥ 2. Liang and Xu provided lower bounds for all λm, and showed that λm 1 as m ∞. We improve on Liang and Xu's bound for m ≥ 3 using this subset perspective.

0

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…