Approximating Bimatrix Nash Equilibrium Via Trilinear Minimax
Abstract
The Bimatrix Nash Equilibrium (NE) for m × n real matrices R and C, denoted as the Row and Column players, is characterized as follows: Let =Sm × Sn, where Sk denotes the unit simplex in Rk. For a given point p=(x,y) ∈ , define R[p]=xTRy and C[p]=xTCy. Consequently, there exists a subset * ⊂ such that for any p*=(x*,y*) ∈ *, p ∈ , y=y*R[p]=R[p*] and p ∈ , x=x* C[p]=C[p*]. The computational complexity of bimatrix NE falls within the class of PPAD-complete. Although the von Neumann Minimax Theorem is a special case of bimatrix NE, we introduce a novel extension termed Trilinear Minimax Relaxation (TMR) with the following implications: Let λ*=α ∈ S2 p ∈ (α1 R[p]+ α2C[p]) and λ*=p ∈ α ∈ S2 (α1 R[p]+ α2C[p]). λ* ≥ λ*. λ* is computable as a linear programming in O(mn) time, ensuring p* ∈ * \R[p*], C[p*]\ ≤ λ*, meaning that in any Nash Equilibrium it is not possible to have both players' payoffs to exceed λ*. λ*=λ* if and only if there exists p* ∈ such that λ*= \R[p*], C[p*]\. Such a p* serves as an approximate Nash Equilibrium. We analyze the cases where such p* exists and is computable. Even when λ* > λ*, we derive approximate Nash Equilibria. In summary, the aforementioned properties of TMR and its efficient computational aspects underscore its significance and relevance for Nash Equilibrium, irrespective of the computational complexity associated with bimatrix Nash Equilibrium. Finally, we extend TMR to scenarios involving three or more players.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.