Morphology rather than environment drives the SFR-Mass relation in the local universe
Abstract
Exploiting a sample of 680 star-forming galaxies from the Padova-Millennium GalaxyGroup Catalog (PM2GC) (Calvi et al. 2011) in the range 0.038<z<0.104, we present a detailed analysis of the Star Formation Rate (SFR)-stellar mass (Mstar) and specific SFR(SSFR)-Mstar relations as a function of environment. We adopt three different parameterizations of environment, to probe different scales. We consider separately 1) galaxies in groups, binary and single systems, defined in terms of a Friends-of-Friends algorithm, 2) galaxies located at different projected local densities, 3) galaxies in haloes of different mass. Overall, above logMast/Msun>10.25 and SSFR>10-12 yr-1, the SFR-Mast and SSFR-Mast relations do not depend on environment, when the global environment is used, while when the halo mass is considered, high mass haloes might have a systematically lower (S)SFR-Mast relation. Finally, when local densities are exploited, at any given mass galaxies in less dense environments have systematically higher values of SFR. All the relations are characterized by a large scatter (σ~0.6), which is dueto the coexistence of galaxies of different morphological types. Indeed, at any given mass, late-types are characterized by systematically higher values of SFR and SSFR than S0s and ellipticals. Galaxies of the same morphology show similar trends in all the environments, but their incidence strongly depends on environment and on the environmental parametrization adopted, with late-types generally becoming less common in denser environments, contrasted by the increase of ellipticals and/or S0s. Our results suggest that in the local universe morphology and local interactions, probed by the local density parameterization, have dominant roles in driving the characteristics of the SFR-Mast relation.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.