More bisections by hyperplane arrangements

Abstract

A union of an arrangement of affine hyperplanes H in Rd is the real algebraic variety associated to the principal ideal generated by the polynomial pH given as the product of the degree one polynomials which define the hyperplanes of the arrangement. A finite Borel measure on Rd is bisected by the arrangement of affine hyperplanes H if the measure on the "non-negative side" of the arrangement \x∈ Rd : pH(x) 0\ is the same as the measure on the "non-positive" side \x∈ Rd : pH(x) 0\. In 2017 Barba, Pilz \& Schnider considered special cases of the following measure partition hypothesis: For a given collection of j finite Borel measures on Rd there exists a k-element affine hyperplane arrangement that bisects each of the measures into equal halves simultaneously. They showed that there are simultaneous bisections in the case when d=k=2 and j=4. They conjectured that every collection of j measures on Rd can be simultaneously bisected with a k-element affine hyperplane arrangement provided that d j/k . The conjecture was confirmed in the case when d j/k=2a by Hubard and Karasev in 2018. In this paper we give a different proof of the Hubard and Karasev result using the framework of Blagojevi\'c, Frick, Haase \& Ziegler (2016), based on the equivariant relative obstruction theory of tom Dieck, which was developed for handling the Gr\"unbaum--Hadwiger--Ramos hyperplane measure partition problem. Furthermore, this approach allowed us to prove even more, that for every collection of 2a(2h+1)+ measures on R2a+, where 1≤ ≤ 2a-1, there exists a (2h+1)-element affine hyperplane arrangement that bisects all of them simultaneously. Our result was extended to the case of spherical arrangements and reproved by alternative methods in a beautiful way by Crabb in 2020.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…