Equivalence between pathbreadth and strong pathbreadth
Abstract
We say that a given graph G = (V, E) has pathbreadth at most , denoted (G) ≤ , if there exists a Roberston and Seymour's path decomposition where every bag is contained in the -neighbourhood of some vertex. Similarly, we say that G has strong pathbreadth at most , denoted (G) ≤ , if there exists a Roberston and Seymour's path decomposition where every bag is the complete -neighbourhood of some vertex. It is straightforward that (G) ≤ (G) for any graph G. Inspired from a close conjecture in [Leitert and Dragan, COCOA'16], we prove in this note that (G) ≤ 4 · (G).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.