MOND in galaxy groups

Abstract

Galaxy groups, which have hardly been looked at in MOND, afford probing the acceleration discrepancies in regions of system-parameter space that are not accessible in well-studied galactic systems, such as galaxies, galaxy clusters, and dwarf-spheroidal satellites of galaxies. Groups are typically the size of galaxy-cluster cores, but have masses typically only a few times that of a single galaxy. Accelerations in groups get far below those in galaxies, and far below the MOND acceleration. So much so, that many groups might be affected by the external-field effect, which is unique to MOND, due to background accelerations. Here, I analyze the MOND dynamics of 53 galaxy groups, recently catalogued in 3 lists. Their Newtonian, K-band, dynamical M/L ratios are a few tens to several hundreds solar units, with Md/LK= (56, 25, 30)~M/L, respectively for the 3 lists; thus evincing very large acceleration discrepancies. I find here that MOND requires dynamical MM/LK values of order 1~M/L, with MM/LK=(0.8, 0.56, 1.0) ~M/L, for the 3 lists, which are in good agreement with population-synthesis stellar values, and with those found in individual galaxies. MOND thus accounts for the observed dynamics in those groups with baryons alone, and no need for dark matter -- an important extension of MOND analysis from galaxies to galactic systems, which, to boot, have characteristic sizes of several hundred kiloparsecs, and accelerations much lower than probed before -- only a few percent of MOND's a0. The acceleration discrepancies evinced by these groups thus conform to the deep-MOND prediction: g≈ (gNa0)1/2, down to these very low accelerations (g is the measured, and gN the baryonic, Newtonian acceleration).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…