Upper Bound for Palindromic and Factor Complexity of Rich Words
Abstract
A finite word w of length n contains at most n+1 distinct palindromic factors. If the bound n+1 is attained, the word w is called rich. An infinite word w is called rich if every finite factor of w is rich. Let w be a word (finite or infinite) over an alphabet with q>1 letters, let F(w,n) be the set of factors of length n of the word w, and let Fp(w,n)⊂eq F(w,n) be the set of palindromic factors of length n of the word w. We present several upper bounds for | F(w,n)| and | Fp(w,n)|, where w is a rich word. In particular we show that \[| F(w,n)| ≤ (q+1)8n2(8q10n)22n+q.\] In 2007, Bal\'a zi, Mas\'akov\'a, and Pelantov\'a showed that \[| Fp(w,n)| +| Fp(w,n+1)| ≤ | F(w,n+1)|-| F(w,n)|+2,\] where w is an infinite word whose set of factors is closed under reversal. We generalize this inequality for finite words.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.