Relative \'Etale Realizations of Motivic Spaces and Dwyer-Friedlander K-Theory of Noncommutative Schemes
Abstract
In this paper, we construct a refined, relative version of the \'etale realization functor of motivic spaces, first studied by Isaksen and Schmidt. Their functor goes from the ∞-category of motivic spaces over a base scheme S to the ∞-category of p-profinite spaces, where p is a prime which is invertible in all residue fields of S. In the first part of this paper, we refine the target of this functor to an ∞-category where p-profinite spaces is a further completion. Roughly speaking, this ∞-category is generated under cofiltered limits by those spaces whose associated "local system" on S is A1-invariant. We then construct a new, relative version of their \'etale realization functor which takes into account the geometry and arithmetic of the base scheme S. For example, when S is the spectrum of a field k, our functor lands in a certain ∞-category equivariant for the absolute Galois group. Our construction relies on a relative version of \'etale homotopy types in the sense of Artin-Mazur-Friedlander, which we also develop in some detail, expanding on previous work of Barnea-Harpaz-Schlank. We then stabilize our functor, in the S1-direction, to produce an \'etale realization functor for motivic S1-spectra (in other words, Nisnevich sheaves of spectra which are A1-invariant). To this end, we also develop an ∞-categorical version of the theory of profinite spectra, first explored by Quick. As an application, we refine the construction of the \'etale K-theory of Dwyer and Friedlander, and define its non-commutative extension. This latter invariant should be seen as an -adic analog of Blanc's theory of semi-topological K-theory of non-commutative schemes. We then formulate and prove an analog of Blanc's conjecture on the torsion part of this theory, generalizing the work of Antieau and Heller.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.