Holomorphic differential forms of complex manifolds on commutative Banach algebras and a few related problems
Abstract
Let A be a commutative Banach algebra. Let M be a complex manifold on A (an A-manifold). Then, we define an A-holomorphic vector bundle (kT*)(M) on M. For an open set U of M, ω is said to be an A-holomorphic differential k-form on U, if ω is an A-holomorphic section of (kT*)(M) on U. So, if the set of all A-holomorphic differential k-forms on U is denoted by Mk(U), then \Mk(U)\U is a sheaf of modules on the structure sheaf OM of the A-manifold M and the cohomology group Hl(M,Mk) with the coefficient sheaf \Mk(U)\U is an OM(M)-module and therefore, in particular, an A-module. There is no new thing in our definition of a holomorphic differential form. However, this is necessary to get the cohomology group Hl(M,Mk) as an A-module. Furthermore, we try to define the structure sheaf of a manifold that is locally a continuous family of C-manifolds (and also the one of an analytic family). Directing attention to a finite family of C-manifolds, we mentioned the possibility that Dolbeault theorem holds for a continuous sum of C-manifolds. Also, we state a few related problems. One of them is the following. Let n∈ N. Then, does there exist a Cn-manifold N such that for any C-manifolds M1, M2, ·s, Mn-1 and Mn, N can not be embedded in the direct product M1× M2 × ·s × Mn-1 × Mn as a Cn-manifold ? So, we propose something that is likely to be a candidate for such a C2-manifold N.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.