Finite-sample analysis of M-estimators using self-concordance
Abstract
The classical asymptotic theory for parametric M-estimators guarantees that, in the limit of infinite sample size, the excess risk has a chi-square type distribution, even in the misspecified case. We demonstrate how self-concordance of the loss allows to characterize the critical sample size sufficient to guarantee a chi-square type in-probability bound for the excess risk. Specifically, we consider two classes of losses: (i) self-concordant losses in the classical sense of Nesterov and Nemirovski, i.e., whose third derivative is uniformly bounded with the 3/2 power of the second derivative; (ii) pseudo self-concordant losses, for which the power is removed. These classes contain losses corresponding to several generalized linear models, including the logistic loss and pseudo-Huber losses. Our basic result under minimal assumptions bounds the critical sample size by O(d · deff), where d the parameter dimension and deff the effective dimension that accounts for model misspecification. In contrast to the existing results, we only impose local assumptions that concern the population risk minimizer θ*. Namely, we assume that the calibrated design, i.e., design scaled by the square root of the second derivative of the loss, is subgaussian at θ*. Besides, for type-ii losses we require boundedness of a certain measure of curvature of the population risk at θ*.Our improved result bounds the critical sample size from above as O(\deff, d d\) under slightly stronger assumptions. Namely, the local assumptions must hold in the neighborhood of θ* given by the Dikin ellipsoid of the population risk. Interestingly, we find that, for logistic regression with Gaussian design, there is no actual restriction of conditions: the subgaussian parameter and curvature measure remain near-constant over the Dikin ellipsoid. Finally, we extend some of these results to 1-penalized estimators in high dimensions.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.