The structure of low-complexity Gibbs measures on product spaces
Abstract
Let K1, …, Kn be bounded, complete, separable metric spaces. Let λi be a Borel probability measure on Ki for each i. Let f:Πi Ki R be a bounded and continuous potential function, and let μ(d x)\ \ ef(x)λ1(d x1)·s λn(d xn) be the associated Gibbs distribution. At each point x ∈ Πi Ki, one can define a `discrete gradient' ∇ f(x,\,·\,) by comparing the values of f at all points which differ from x in at most one coordinate. In case Πi Ki = \-1,1\n ⊂ Rn, the discrete gradient ∇ f(x,\,·\,) is naturally identified with a vector in Rn. This paper shows that a `low-complexity' assumption on ∇ f implies that μ can be approximated by a mixture of other measures, relatively few in number, and most of them close to product measures in the sense of optimal transport. This implies also an approximation to the partition function of f in terms of product measures, along the lines of Chatterjee and Dembo's theory of `nonlinear large deviations'. An important precedent for this work is a result of Eldan in the case Πi Ki = \-1,1\n. Eldan's assumption is that the discrete gradients ∇ f(x,\,·\,) all lie in a subset of Rn that has small Gaussian width. His proof is based on the careful construction of a diffusion in Rn which starts at the origin and ends with the desired distribution on the subset \-1,1\n. Here our assumption is a more naive covering-number bound on the set of gradients \∇ f(x,\,·\,):\ x ∈ Πi Ki\, and our proof relies only on basic inequalities of information theory. As a result, it is shorter, and applies to Gibbs measures on arbitrary product spaces.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.