The Intrinsic Stochasticity of the 56Ni Distribution of Single-Degenerate Type Ia Supernovae

Abstract

Binary Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs accreting mass from non-degenerate stellar companions through the single-degenerate channel have reigned for decades as the leading explanation of Type Ia supernovae. Yet, a comprehensive theoretical explanation has not yet emerged to explain the expected properties of the canonical near-Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf model. A simmering phase within the convective core of the white dwarf leads to the ignition of one or more flame bubbles scattered across the core. Consequently, near-Chandrasekhar-mass single-degenerate SNe Ia are inherently stochastic, and are expected to lead to a range of outcomes, from subluminous SN 2002cx-like events, to overluminous SN 1991T-like events. However, all prior simulations of the single-degenerate channel carried through the detonation phase have set the ignition points as free parameters. In this work, for the first time, we place ignition points as predicted by ab initio models of the convective phase leading up to ignition, and follow through the detonation phase in fully three-dimensional simulations. Single-degenerates in this framework are characteristically overluminous. Using a statistical approach, we determine the 56Ni mass distribution arising from stochastic ignition. While there is a total spread of 0.2 M for detonating models, the distribution is strongly left-skewed, and with a narrow standard deviation of 0.03 M. Conversely, if single-degenerates are not overluminous but primarily yield normal or failed events, then the models require fine-tuning of the ignition parameters, or otherwise require revised physics or progenitor models. We discuss implications of our findings for the modeling of single-degenerate SNe Ia.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…