Pion electromagnetic form factor at high precision with implications to aμππ and the onset of perturbative QCD

Abstract

We extend recently developed methods used for determining the electromagnetic charge radius and aμππ to obtain a determination of the electromagnetic form factor of the pion, FπV(t), in several significant kinematical regions, using a parametrization-free formalism based on analyticity and unitarity, and with the inclusion of precise inputs from both timelike and spacelike regions. On the unitarity cut, below the first inelastic threshold we use the precisely known phase of the form factor, known from ππ elastic scattering via the Fermi-Watson theorem, and above the inelastic threshold a conservative integral condition on the modulus. We also use as input the experimental values of the modulus at several energies in the elastic region, where the data from e+e- π+π- and τ hadronic decays are mutually consistent, as well as the most recent measurements at spacelike momenta. The experimental uncertainties are implemented by Monte Carlo simulations. At spacelike values Q2=-t>0 near the origin, our predictions are consistent and significantly more precise than the recent QCD lattice calculations. The determinations at larger Q2 confirm the late onset of perturbative QCD for exclusive quantities. From the predictions of |FπV(t)|2 on the timelike axis below 0.63 GeV, we obtain the hadronic vacuum polarization (HPV) contribution to the muon anomaly, aμππ|≤ 0.63 = (132.97 0.70)× 10-10, using input from both e+e- annihilation and τ decay, and aμππ|≤ 0.63 = (132.91 0.76)× 10-10 using only e+e- input. Our determinations can be readily extended to obtain such contributions in any interval of interest lying between 2 mπ and 0.63 GeV.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…